On 20 October 2026, Ho Chi Minh City Grassroots Tax Office No. 2 issued Official Letter No. 13194/TCS2-QLDN2, responding to an enterprise's questions on tax registration, tax declaration, tax payment and deductible expenses when purchasing online advertising services from Meta Platforms Ireland Limited ("Meta"). The key point: an enterprise paying VAT under the input-credit method must itself withhold and pay VAT and corporate income tax (CIT) on behalf of Meta each time it makes a payment, even though Meta already holds a tax identification number in Vietnam.
Enterprises paying VAT under the input-credit method. When purchasing advertising for which Meta does not charge or collect 10% VAT (the payment price excludes Vietnamese tax), the enterprise is responsible for withholding, declaring and paying on Meta's behalf both VAT and CIT (Article 9 of Circular No. 69/2025/TT-BTC; Article 7 of Circular No. 20/2026/TT-BTC). This must be done at the time of payment to Meta, in accordance with Clause 3, Article 43 and Clause 1, Article 44 of Decree No. 252/2026/ND-CP (effective from 1 July 2026). Meta is not required to declare and pay tax on the portion of revenue for which tax has been withheld and paid by the Vietnamese party (Clause 3, Article 43 of Decree 252/2026/ND-CP).
Meta's tax identification number does not replace the withholding obligation. Meta has been granted a tax identification number in Vietnam (9000000327) so that it can directly declare and pay tax on revenue for which tax has not been withheld and paid by a Vietnamese party - for example, revenue from individuals or from organizations not applying the input-credit method.
Enterprises paying VAT under the direct method are not subject to withholding and paying on behalf under Clause 3, Article 43 of Decree 252/2026/ND-CP. In that case, the obligation to declare and pay tax rests with Meta.
Where the enterprise has not signed a direct paper contract with Meta and transacts electronically, it may use the following electronic records and data as the basis for determining its tax obligations:
The enterprise must keep these records on file and present them upon request by the tax authority (under Circular 89/2026/TT-BTC).
For enterprises paying tax under the input-credit method, the document evidencing payment to the State Budget of VAT paid on Meta's behalf is the very document used to claim input VAT credit, provided two conditions are met: the service is used for VAT-taxable production and business activities, and there are valid non-cash payment documents (Points a and b, Clause 2, Article 14 of the Law on Value-Added Tax No. 48/2024/QH15; Article 26 of Decree No. 181/2025/ND-CP).
The Official Letter distinguishes two cases in which VAT paid on behalf is not creditable:
| Reason the VAT is not creditable | CIT treatment |
| The service is used for producing and trading goods and services not subject to VAT (the expense still meets the conditions in Article 9 of Decree 320/2025/ND-CP) | The VAT paid on behalf is a deductible expense (Article 9 of the Law on Corporate Income Tax No. 67/2025/QH15; Articles 9 and 10 of Decree No. 320/2025/ND-CP) |
| No non-cash payment, or the expense is not related to production and business activities | The entire advertising expense and the corresponding tax paid on behalf are non-deductible |
General conditions for an expense to be deductible (Clause 1, Article 9 of Decree 320/2025/ND-CP): (a) it is actually incurred and related to production and business activities; (b) it is supported by adequate invoices and documents as prescribed; (c) it is supported by non-cash payment documents for each payment of VND 5 million or more.
Documentation package the enterprise should prepare:
For VAT paid on behalf that is not creditable, the enterprise should account for it in accordance with the prevailing accounting standards and the enterprise accounting regime it applies. The Official Letter does not provide specific accounting entries.
View Official Letter No. 13194/TCS2-QLDN2
This newsletter is prepared by Crowe Vietnam for general information purposes only and does not constitute advice for any specific case. Enterprises should refer to the original legal instruments and consult professional advisors before applying the above to their particular circumstances.