Recent military action in Iran and the Middle East has triggered significant volatility across energy and financial markets, creating indirect impacts for businesses through higher costs and supply chain disruption.
These sudden, externally driven shifts heighten the pressure on financial reporting judgements, increasing uncertainty around key assumptions and pushing conclusions closer to judgement thresholds. As a result, boards and management face greater scrutiny from auditors and regulators and a need for clearer, well-evidenced, entity-specific assessments.
Even where trading performance appears resilient, changes triggered by geopolitical instability - including energy costs, financing availability and investor sentiment - can materially affect estimates, valuations and disclosures. Management must therefore reassess assumptions promptly and ensure that the impact of heightened uncertainty is appropriately reflected and clearly explained. UK businesses should ensure particular focus on the following areas:
Forecasts and impairment
Volatility can quickly reduce headroom in cash flow models. Forecast assumptions, discount rates and long-term growth rates should be reassessed, with careful consideration of whether impairment indicators have arisen. Sensitivity analysis becomes increasingly important where conclusions are finely balanced.
Going concern and viability
UK regulators expect material geopolitical developments to be explicitly reflected in going concern and viability assessments. Ongoing macroeconomic volatility increases downside risk through elevated energy prices, supply chain disruption and broader economic uncertainty, which may erode forecast headroom and place greater pressure on judgement-based conclusions.
This heightens the risk of material uncertainty for entities with limited liquidity headroom, elevated leverage or reliance on refinancing in tighter market conditions. Regulators and auditors are therefore focused on the severity and plausibility of stress testing scenarios, the realism of financing and covenant assumptions and the credibility and specificity of management’s mitigating actions.
Clear, entity-specific disclosure is critical, including a transparent explanation of key judgements, estimation uncertainty and the alignment between narrative reporting, going concern conclusions and the assumptions underpinning the financial statements, in line with the FRC’s 2025 guidance.
Inventory and onerous contracts
Cost inflation and operational disruption may affect inventory valuation, cut-off and net realisable value assessments. Fixed price or long term contracts may become loss-making, increasing judgement around provisions and onerous contract assessments.
Credit risk and expected credit losses
Customer and counterparty risk can change rapidly. Expected credit loss models should be reviewed to ensure staging, forward-looking information, and assumptions remain appropriate, supportable and clearly documented.
Pensions and valuations
Market movements can impact discount rates, asset values and actuarial assumptions, particularly for defined benefit pension schemes and fair value measurements. Assumptions should be up to date, internally consistent and accompanied by clear sensitivity disclosures where outcomes are judgemental.
Clear, entity specific disclosure matters
Auditors and regulators continue to focus on the quality of disclosure. Generic wording is unlikely to be sufficient. Financial statements should clearly explain how key judgements have been made, which assumptions are most sensitive, and how conclusions align with the wider narrative reporting.
How can we support
As an audit and accounting practice, we support boards and finance teams in navigating complex areas of judgement. This includes challenging key assumptions, stress testing forecasts, assessing impairment and going concern conclusions, and improving the quality and clarity of financial statement disclosures. Early engagement and robust documentation can help reduce late-stage audit challenges and increase confidence in reported outcomes.
Key takeaway
In an uncertain environment, disciplined judgement and high-quality, entity-specific reporting are essential. Proactively revisiting assumptions, strengthening documentation and engaging early on areas of complexity can help businesses stay ahead of regulatory and audit scrutiny.
If you have any questions, please get in touch with your usual Crowe contact.
Contact us
