The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) made comprehensive changes to Financial Reporting Standards 102. These changes are effective for accounting periods which begin on or after 1 January 2026, with early adoption permitted.
In developing the revised standards, the FRC has considered:
Section 23 of FRS102 has been replaced to introduce the five-step revenue recognition model. Previously under UK GAAP, revenue recognition fell into two areas – revenue from the sale of goods, and revenue from the rendering of services with additional guidance around construction contracts.
This new model will require businesses to consider the individual terms of revenue-generating contracts to appropriately recognise revenue. To apply the model, an entity shall take the following steps:

The amendments result in a 'more robust' approach to revenue accounting. The standard now includes guidance on matters not previously dealt with. These include:
Review their revenue arrangements and understand the performance obligations and the transaction price.
Identify when a performance obligation is satisfied and the revenue recognised. Where this leads to a different recognition pattern to the previous requirements the effect on reported performance should be understood together with possible consequences. (e.g. the need to amend systems to capture the required information, and impact on reported amounts for covenant compliance.)
In addition to a change in the approach to revenue recognition, the amendments introduce additional disclosure requirements, which apply to all entities who apply FRS 102.
Businesses do not need to restate comparatives. Where the amendments lead to a change in the previously reported amount, this will be applied as an opening balance adjustment in the first period for the cumulative impact. There are several transitional provisions to simplify the initial implementation.
The biggest change is the removal of the distinction between a finance lease and an operating lease. All leases, subject to certain limited exceptions, will be brought onto the balance sheet in a manner consistent with the current treatment for a finance lease.
Where an entity has, for example, property leases, these will need to be recognised on the balance sheet as a ‘right of use asset’ (ROUA) with a corresponding lease liability.
Previously, such leases would have been an operating lease accounted for on a ‘pay as you go’ basis, with future liability only a disclosure within the financial statements.
The effect on reported profit will be to remove the rental charge and replace it with depreciation of the ROUA, and an interest expense on the lease liability. Although the total effect on profit for the duration of the lease is the same, the accounting will change the timing of the expense. It becomes front end loaded with a higher total expense recognised in earlier years of the lease arrangement which is illustrated in the example below.
As the expense is accounted for as depreciation and interest rather than rent. This will change key performance measures such as earnings before interest, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) and the interest expense. Reported EBITDA will increase under the proposals, as the rental will move out of operating expenditure and into interest and depreciation but with an increase in the interest expense which may impact on loan covenants.
Considerations for metrics are outlined in the table below:

In the cashflow statement, the rentals, previously treated as part of operating cashflows, will be replaced with an interest cashflow and liability repayments, the latter being classified as financing cashflows. The net effect is that a business will report higher cash generated from operations, but with an increase in financing cashflows. The overall net cashflow will be the same.
Implementing the changes will also present management with additional challenges in preparing accounts. Management will need to gather lease documentation to determine, for example, whether you have a lease, what is the lease term, what future payments to include and what discount rate to apply to the future payments.
This is quite complex, but broadly, where the arrangement provides the lessee with the ability to control the use of a defined asset for a period of time it will be a lease.
The ROUA is set as the amount of the lease liability, together with any payments made before commencement of the lease and less any incentives received. The lease liability is the present value of the lease payments due to be made over the lease term. Where there are options to extend a lease, these will be included but only where it is reasonably certain that the extension will be taken, reasonably certain is a high threshold.
The lease liability should be discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease – this is the rate of interest that causes the present value of:
To equal the sum of:
If that rate cannot be readily determined:
If none of these can be determined, Public Benefit Entities are able to fall back on the interest rate obtainable on deposits held with financial institutions.
There are two main exemptions for lessees. If the lease term is no more than 12 months, it may be accounted for as an operating lease. This is on a straight line basis over the lease term, and without recognition of a lease liability on the balance sheet. Similarly, if the underlying asset is of low value, it may also adopt this treatment. A low value asset is not defined by monetary amounts, but typically would include items such as laptops, mobile phones and items of furniture.
The accounting for lessors remains broadly the same as existing requirements, with the distinction, and different accounting applying, depending upon whether the lease is an operating lease or a finance lease. Most leases with tenants will be classed as operating leases.
The changes to lessee accounting will have consequences for lessors where they enter into back-to-back arrangements, or sale and leasebacks.
Entities do not need to restate comparatives. The amendments will be applied as an opening balance adjustment for the cumulative impact. However, as a practical expedient an entity can measure the ROUA at the lease liability adjusted, where you have prepaid or accrued lease payments in the reporting period immediately before the date of initial application. The lease liability may be measured initially at the discounted amount of remaining lease payments over the remaining lease term at the date of initial application.
The amendments introduce additional disclosures for leases, with both qualitative and quantitative information to be given. Materiality may be applied to the disclosures.
The amendments introduce a new appendix on Fair Value Measurement which provides more details on measurement and valuation techniques. We do not consider that this will make significant changes to accounting treatment.
For small entities applying the reduced disclosures of Section1A, the amendments introduce a significant number of additional disclosures. These include disclosures in respect of:
FRS102 amendments are effective for periods commencing on or after 1 January 2026.
This will mean entities will prepare first period financial statements for the year end 31 December 2026 or 31 March 2027.
For further information, please get in touch with your usual Crowe contact.
Insights