For many years, UK sport has operated an uneasy but workable compromise on ‘image rights’: clubs could contract for a player’s commercial likeness through a separate image rights company, and HMRC while scrutinising the practice, accepted genuine arrangements.
From April 2027, the landscape changes significantly. Under proposals announced in the 2025 Budget and expected to be legislated in Finance Bill 2026–27, any image rights payment that is ‘related to an employment’ will be treated as employment income, subject to PAYE and Class 1 NICs for both player and club. In effect, once the payment connects to the employment, it must go through payroll regardless of whether it is paid to a company.
This represents a major shift from the current ‘dual contract’ model often used in professional sport, particularly football.
HMRC has consistently said the UK has no freestanding legal image right; instead, the term reflects a bundle of contractual and IP related interests (e.g. trademarks, goodwill, commercial likeness). Under current practice, clubs frequently enter:
HMRC historically accepted this model where the commercial arrangements were genuine and could be evidenced.
The new rules deem any employment related image rights payments to be earnings, triggering:
This dramatically increases the cost for both parties. For top athletes, the highest marginal UK rate (income tax + NIC) is up to 47%, compared with corporation tax of up to 25% (and if no remuneration is taken out, no personal tax liability arises) under the old model. Clubs will also face materially higher wage bill costs.
With Real Time Information (RTI) rules, PAYE must be paid shortly after remuneration is made, accelerating cash flow pressure.
These changes place real strain on traditional ‘dual contract’ arrangements and will inevitably influence negotiations ahead of the 2027/28 season.
The image rights company is not dead. Certain categories can still sit outside the employment tax net if they are genuinely independent of the club role and can be properly evidenced. This includes:
However, HMRC will undoubtedly test anything that appears ‘dual purpose’ particularly where sponsors overlap with the club or activation relies heavily on club assets.
No, but its use becomes more specialised. Corporate structures will remain viable for:
But club‑linked image rights fees, no matter how separately documented, are highly likely to be treated as employment income from April 2027.
Although overshadowed by headline Budget measures, the April 2027 image rights reforms represent the most significant shift in the area for more than a decade. Those who begin planning now will be best placed to renegotiate appropriately, restructure sensibly, and avoid unwelcome HMRC scrutiny.
For more information or to discuss your personal circumstances, please contact below, or your usual Crowe advisor.