On 1 January 2025, Australia introduced legislation that criminalises the intentional underpayment of wages, commonly referred to as wage theft. This marks a significant shift in employment law, placing greater accountability on employers to ensure full compliance with wage obligations.
The consequences for breaching these laws are severe:
Wage theft occurs when an employer intentionally engages in conduct that results in an employee not receiving their lawful entitlements on time. These entitlements are defined under the Fair Work Act, Modern Awards, and Enterprise Agreements, and include:
Importantly, the offence does not extend to payments based solely on contractual terms, such as bonuses or incentive schemes.
Under the Fair Work Act an employer’s 'intention' can be established in one of three ways:
While most businesses are unlikely to fall under the first category, many may be at risk under the second or third if they lack effective governance or tolerate non-compliance in practice.
Businesses may inadvertently breach wage compliance regulations through several common risk areas. These breaches can lead to wage theft claims, reputational damage, and legal consequences.
Contractor vs employee misclassification
In contrast to employees, contractors do not receive paid leave entitlements, overtime, redundancy pay etc and therefore misclassifying an employee as a contractor could lead to a wage-theft claim. It is essential to correctly determine employment status and document the basis for classification at the outset of each new engagement. Factors taken into account when determining employment status include the degree of control, integration and financial risk
Application of Modern Awards
Australia has over 120 Modern Awards, which supplement the National Employment Standards by providing additional entitlements such as minimum wage rates, overtime, allowances, and annual leave loading. Employers must have robust processes to, identify the correct Modern Award for each employee and apply its terms accurately.
Failure to apply the correct Award or misclassifying employees may lead to significant underpayments and wage theft allegations.
Inadequate time tracking
Overtime entitlements typically apply to work performed outside standard hours, as defined in the relevant Modern Award. Without accurate time tracking and formal overtime approval processes, businesses risk underpaying employees, which can be construed as wage theft.
Late payments
Timely payment is critical. Even if the correct amount is paid, delays can constitute wage theft. Termination payments must be made by the final day of employment or the next scheduled pay cycle. Best practice, as advised by the Fair Work Ombudsman, is to pay within seven days of termination.
Unlawful deductions
Deductions from wages are only lawful with an employee’s consent, by court order, by Fair Work Commission order or if required by law. Recovering overpaid salary should be handled with care in order to avoid a wage theft claim.
Incorrect pay calculations
It’s essential that pay calculations are correct - there are specific rules relating to a ‘days pay’ when calculating annual leave and personal and carers leave. Also, redundancy pay and notice pay use different definitions of pay (the former is based on basic pay only whereas the latter includes allowances). Using the wrong calculation could be construed as wage theft.
In all the above scenarios, a lack of proper governance, oversight, or internal controls may be sufficient to establish ‘intent’ in a wage theft case—even if the breach was not deliberate.
To mitigate the risk of wage theft claims, businesses should adopt a proactive and compliant approach to wage management:
Creating a culture of compliance and accountability is key to protecting your business from wage theft allegations. Our HR team can help you put in place the correct controls
Insights