Female engineer inspecting commercial buildings as part of a property assessment

Capital allowances

Maximising tax relief on capital expenditure for property and businesses across the UK.

Ensuring you claim eligible property capital allowances


Capital allowances are a valuable way for businesses to reduce tax on property expenditure, yet they are often underclaimed. Qualifying costs can extend beyond obvious plant and machinery to include fixtures and elements of construction and refurbishment, but are frequently embedded within wider project or acquisition costs and are therefore missed.

In this environment, specialist property capital allowances advice can make a meaningful difference. Taking the right approach can help identify overlooked opportunities, improve the timing of claims and reduce overall tax liabilities.

Our specialists advise on a wide range of property-related matters, from new developments and fit-outs to acquisitions, disposals and historic expenditure reviews. By combining tax and property expertise, we deliver accurate, robust claims designed to reflect the complexity of the UK capital allowances regime and stand up to scrutiny, often alongside our wider Real Estate tax services and Corporate Tax services.

Capital allowances available on property expenditure


Businesses can claim different types of capital allowances depending on the nature and timing of property expenditure, as well as how the property is used. Multiple reliefs may apply to a single project, influencing both the timing and value of tax relief, which makes careful planning essential.

Current reliefs commonly relevant to property

Close up of a cog wheel

Main pool

The main pool is often where the core operational plant in a project is captured. Its treatment helps determine how quickly general qualifying assets generate tax relief over time.

At a glance

  • Covers general plant and machinery assets.
  • Can include qualifying items within fit-outs.
  • Requires separation from special rate spend.
  • Classification affects relief timing and value.
Electric cables at night

Special rate pool 

The special rate pool applies to integral features, building systems and other qualifying assets, and is key to understanding relief timing and cost allocation.

At a glance

  • Covers integral features and related systems.
  • Embedded in construction or fit-out costs.
  • Relief is slower than the main pool allowance.
  • Detailed records support accurate cost splits.
Professional inspecting equipment

Annual investment allowances (AIA)

AIA is often considered in a capital allowances review. It can materially accelerate relief where project costs are analysed early and matched to the right asset categories.

At a glance

  • Offers 100% relief for many qualifying costs.
  • Uses fixtures and integral features in fit-outs.
  • Separate plant and structural spend.
  • Timing, limits and group rules affect claims.
Solar-panels-and-sunset

First-year allowances (FYA)

FYAs are targeted reliefs that can change the timing of tax deductions significantly. They are most useful where the project facts, asset type and claim period all support the relevant regime.

At a glance

  • Can give upfront relief for qualifying assets.
  • Depends on the asset being new and unused.
  • Improves relief timing and project cash flow.
  • Non-qualifying costs may still enter the pools.
glass buildings construction

Structures and buildings allowance (SBA)

SBA applies once the plant and machinery are separated from the wider works. It provides a route to relief for qualifying structural costs that fall outside plant and machinery allowances.

At a glance

  • Applies to qualifying structural expenditure.
  • Relevant to new builds and refurbishments.
  • Requires plant costs to be carved out first.
  • An SBA statement supports future claims.
Excavator at work

Land remediation relief (LRR)

LRR is a specialist relief that can be important on contaminated sites and refurbishment projects. Its value depends on linking the qualifying costs to genuine remediation activity and evidence.

At a glance

  • Can enhance relief for remediation costs.
  • May cover asbestos and harmful substances.
  • Polluter restrictions must be considered.
  • Evidence is key to supporting the claim.
Previous or discontinued reliefs

Super deduction

The super deduction was introduced as a temporary incentive for companies investing in qualifying new plant and machinery. It applied to qualifying expenditure incurred between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2023 and gave faster relief than normal writing down allowances.

Overview

Broadly, qualifying main rate expenditure could attract a 130% deduction, while certain special rate expenditure could qualify for a separate 50% first year allowance. The regime was particularly relevant to capital-intensive property, fit-out and operational projects undertaken during the qualifying period.

Eligibility and restrictions

The relief was available only to companies and was subject to conditions on timing, asset type and use. Restrictions applied to certain leased assets, second-hand assets, cars and expenditure falling outside the relevant statutory window.

Interaction with other allowances

The super deduction sat alongside the wider capital allowances regime, including AIA, FYAs and writing down allowances. Expenditure that failed to qualify, or qualified only in part, still needed to be allocated to the main pool or special rate pool as appropriate.

Key rules and considerations

Although the regime has ended, a historic review can still be valuable where claims were not fully analysed. The key points are the expenditure date, asset condition, categorisation and whether any exclusions reduced or prevented the enhanced deduction.

Enhanced capital allowances (ECA)

ECA were a historic form of 100% first year relief for specific energy-saving and water-efficient technologies. The regime is generally relevant only to expenditure incurred before its abolition, but it can remain relevant to historic reviews.

Overview

ECAs applied where assets met the approved technology criteria in force when the expenditure was incurred. They were often relevant to plant and machinery, such as efficient heating, cooling, lighting, water-saving and other qualifying environmental technologies.

Eligibility and restrictions

Eligibility depended on the asset meeting the relevant product, technology or performance criteria at the time. The expenditure also needed to be qualifying plant and machinery expenditure and could be restricted where the asset or claimant did not meet the regime conditions.

Interaction with other allowances

ECA claims needed to be considered alongside AIA, FYAs and writing down allowances. Where ECA was unavailable, the expenditure may still have qualified for another capital allowance category, depending on the asset and timing.

Key rules and considerations

Historic claims require evidence that the asset met the applicable criteria when purchased. Product specifications, certification, invoices and project records can be important in confirming whether the full relief was available and whether it was claimed correctly.

When is expenditure incurred?


For capital allowances purposes, timing is often as important as identifying the qualifying expenditure itself. Relief is not determined simply by when payment is made. Instead, it can depend on when a legal obligation becomes unconditional, how contractual terms operate in practice, and whether special rules apply to issues such as deferred payment, pre-trading expenditure or expenditure incurred over a longer project timeline.

Getting the timing right can have a material impact on the value and profile of relief. It may determine the accounting period in which allowances are available, whether access to enhanced reliefs is preserved, and what steps should be taken in the context of acquisitions, disposals or historic claims. Early review can therefore help businesses secure the right outcome and avoid missed opportunities.

Contracts, delivery and deferred payment

Expenditure is generally incurred when the obligation to pay becomes unconditional, which will often be on delivery, completion or another contractual trigger. The legal and commercial terms need to be reviewed carefully, especially where title, acceptance or certification provisions apply.

Where contracts include contingent terms or multiple milestones, the point at which expenditure becomes unconditional may not be straightforward. Careful review of delivery conditions and payment terms is therefore required to ensure allowances are claimed in the correct period.

If payment is due more than four months later, the timing of incurrence may move to the contractual due date instead. Deferred payment terms can therefore change the period in which relief falls and should be analysed before returns are prepared.

Assets under construction and stage payments

Projects carried out over more than one accounting period often raise detailed timing issues. The point at which expenditure is incurred can depend on how contracts are structured, whether stage payments create unconditional obligations, and when the relevant asset or works are delivered or certified.

In some cases, expenditure relating to earlier construction or refurbishment projects may still require detailed review to determine whether qualifying costs have been correctly identified and allocated across the life of the project.

Early review can help identify qualifying expenditure in the correct period and support claims as a project progresses. Pre-trading capital spend may also require separate consideration, as special rules can treat it as incurred when the qualifying activity begins.

Property acquisitions and disposals

On property transactions, timing is important not only for claims but also for preserving entitlement. Where properties include fixtures acquired before April 2008, entitlement to allowances may depend on the fixture history and prior claims position, requiring careful analysis to determine whether any unrelieved expenditure remains available. The availability of relief may depend on the history of the asset, whether expenditure has been pooled, and whether fixtures are dealt with properly as part of the acquisition or disposal process.

Transaction documents and post-completion actions should be reviewed carefully, including any agreed-upon values for fixtures. Addressing these points at the right time can help secure the intended outcome and reduce the risk of allowances being restricted or lost.

Losses, reliefs and late claims

The period in which expenditure is incurred can affect the profile and value of relief. Claiming in the right period may increase available losses, preserve access to time-sensitive allowances and improve the overall tax outcome for businesses with current or expected losses.

Although claims are generally made within the relevant chargeable period, missed allowances may still be recoverable in certain circumstances, subject to the applicable statutory time limits and the specific facts of each case. Where expenditure was not claimed at the earliest opportunity, the position should still be reviewed promptly. Some reliefs are only available in the period of incurrence, while other qualifying expenditure may still be pooled and relieved later, subject to the applicable rules and claim time limits.

Case studies

How we have helped our clients


Our latest thinking


Contact us


Stephen Metheringham
Stephen Metheringham
Director, Capital AllowancesLondon