Transfer pricing has become one of the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) most active areas of scrutiny. The CRA is not only auditing more aggressively but also taking firmer positions – making it increasingly difficult for companies to reverse those decisions once they’re made.
At its core, transfer pricing refers to how related companies price transactions across borders. From the CRA’s perspective, the central issue is whether profits that should be taxed in Canada are being shifted elsewhere. What’s changed in the current marketplace is how specifically - and persistently - the CRA is challenging that.
One clear trend is the CRA’s resistance to downward adjustments - reductions in taxable income or increases to losses/capital expenses that would shift income to a foreign jurisdiction.
These cases signal that the CRA is increasingly unwilling to accept adjustments that reduce Canadian taxable income.
1 Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. Canada, 2024 SCC 23 (CanLII).
2 MEGlobal Canada ULC v. His Majesty the King, 2025 TCC (CanLII) — decision released March 26, 2025 (Tax Court of Canada).
Intercompany services remain a major audit hotspot. In the ongoing ExxonMobil Canada Resources case3, the CRA is scrutinizing whether the Canadian entity actually received a benefit from services charged by related parties. This reflects a common audit theme: documenting a charge is not enough - the CRA wants clear evidence of value and business purpose.
3 ExxonMobil Canada Resources Company v. Canada (Tax Court of Canada, ongoing proceeding).
Intellectual property and royalty payments are also firmly in scope. The Owens Corning Canada case4 illustrates how the CRA is approaching cross-border payments tied to intangible assets, particularly where profits flow out of Canada. The CRA is increasingly focused on whether the Canadian entity’s functions justify the level of income it retains—particularly when development, strategic decision-making, or other key activities occur in Canada.
4 Owens Corning Canada LP v. Canada (Tax Court of Canada, ongoing proceeding).
These cases highlight a broader shift: the CRA is not just challenging pricing—it is asserting greater control over the dispute process itself. Once the CRA takes a position, unwinding it can be difficult and time-consuming, often requiring litigation across multiple courts.
At the same time, legislative changes are reinforcing this direction. Recent federal proposals signal an intent to strengthen Canada’s transfer pricing rules and align them more closely with global standards.
This means:
For Canadian businesses, the message is clear. Transfer pricing is no longer a compliance exercise that can be addressed after the fact.
The CRA is focusing on specific, high-risk areas, including:
In today’s environment, the question isn’t just whether your transfer pricing works on paper. It’s whether it can withstand a detailed review by a CRA that is increasingly prepared and empowered to challenge it.
Navigating the evolving landscape of transfer pricing and international tax compliance demands strategic insight.
This article has been prepared for the general information of our clients. Please note that this publication should not be considered a substitute for personalized advice related to your situation.
Contact Us