In February 2026, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) released GST/HST Notice 344, confirming its updated administrative position on the GST/HST treatment of mutual fund trailing commissions1. Under this revised approach, most trailing commissions paid by mutual fund managers to dealers will be treated as taxable supplies effective July 1, 2026.
Notice 344 provides formal administrative guidance and explains that this revised treatment reflects regulatory and operational developments in the industry. This change is expected to have compliance and commercial implications across the investment management industry.
The CRA has indicated that the revised position will apply to supplies made on or after that date, providing industry participants with time to update contractual arrangements, modify internal systems, and implement the necessary GST/HST compliance changes.
Historically, the CRA treated trailing commissions as consideration for an exempt financial service, on the basis that they were part of the service of “arranging for” the issuance or distribution of mutual fund units. This position was confirmed as recently as January 13, 2022, in GST/HST Interpretation 187184 – Application of GST/HST to mutual fund trailing commissions in the mutual fund industry, in which the CRA stated that trailing commissions were generally exempt from GST/HST, other than in limited “exceptional circumstances”.
In Notice 344, the CRA indicated that this characterization no longer reflects how the industry operates or presents its services. Based on a review of current regulations, industry practices, and publicly available descriptions of dealer and advisor activities, the CRA now views trailing commissions as compensation for ongoing services such as investment account servicing, support, and advice.
Notice 344 specifically relies on the exclusions in paragraphs (p) (advice) and (q.1) (asset management services) of the definition of “financial service” in subsection 123(1) of the Excise Tax Act. Because advisory and asset management services are excluded from the definition of financial service, they are not exempt and are subject to GST/HST. The CRA considers most services performed by dealers in exchange for trailing commissions to fall within one or both of these exclusions.
Importantly, the CRA has stated that it does not consider this development to represent a change in its interpretation of the law. Rather, it views the revised tax treatment as a consequence of regulatory and operational changes in the mutual fund industry – particularly amendments to National Instrument 81-105, which require dealers to provide ongoing suitability determinations and advice in order to earn trailing commissions.
The GST/HST treatment of brokering the initial issuance of mutual fund units remains unchanged. Arranging for the initial issuance of units continues to be an exempt financial service, and upfront commissions or one-time trading fees remain exempt from GST/HST.
Notice 344 also clarifies that brokering the issuance of units (for which a one-time trading fee may be earned) is considered a separate supply from the ongoing services supplied in exchange for trailing commissions. In rare cases where a dealer earns only trailing commissions in exchange for both brokering and ongoing services, the CRA considers the combined supply to be predominantly advisory and/or asset management in nature and therefore taxable.
1 The term “mutual fund trailing commission” is not defined in the Excise Tax Act. The term (also referred to as a trailer fee or trailer commission) is explained by the CRA to mean an ongoing payment made by a mutual fund manager to an investment dealer, typically calculated on a periodic basis and paid for as long as an investor continues to hold units or shares of a mutual fund. The trailing commission is paid under a dealer agreement and is intended to compensate the dealer for ongoing services provided to the investor, such as investment advice, account servicing, and related investor support. Trailing commissions are separate from, and in addition to, any upfront commissions that may be paid at the time of the initial investment. [Excise and GST/HST News - No. 111]
The table below summarizes the CRA’s prior administrative position compared to its revised approach effective July 1, 2026.
| Issue | CRA Prior Position (pre-July 1, 2026) | CRA Revised Position (effective July 1, 2026) |
| Characterization of trailing commissions | Consideration for arranging for the sale or distribution of mutual fund units | Consideration for ongoing services such as account servicing, investment support, and advice |
| GST/HST status | Generally exempt from GST/HST as an exempt financial service | Generally taxable for GST/HST purposes |
| Primary reference | 13 January 2022 GST/HST Interpretation 187184 – Application of GST/HST to mutual fund trailing commissions in the mutual fund industry |
CRA Notice 344 – Application of the GST/HST to Mutual Fund Trailing Commissions (February 2026) |
| Relevant ETA provisions | Paragraphs (d) and (l) of the definition of “financial service” in subsection 123(1) of the Excise Tax Act |
Paragraph (p) and (q.1) of the definition of “financial service” in subsection 123(1) (advice and asset management exclusions) |
| Upfront commissions / trading fees | Exempt from GST/HST | No change, remain exempt |
| Dealers’ registration status | Many dealers may not have been required to register solely in respect of trailing commissions | Dealers may be required to register, charge, collect, and remit GST/HST |
| Agents and advisors | Commissions generally exempt | Commissions flowing from dealers to agents in respect of ongoing advisory or asset management services generally taxable |
| Administrative approach | Required tracking of unit transfers (original vs new dealers) | CRA expects simplified administration through consistent tax treatment |
| QST treatment | Generally aligned with GST/HST exemption | Unclear whether Revenu Quebec will adopt a similar approach |
While funds and investors are not directly responsible for charging or remitting tax, the change may indirectly influence product pricing, compensation structures, and management expense ratios over time. For example, a 13% HST applied to a $100 annual trailing commission could increase costs for managers or reduce dealer margins if not passed on.
Although the change applies prospectively, advance preparation will be critical. Industry participants should consider:
The CRA’s revised approach represents a clear shift in how trailing commissions are characterized for GST/HST purposes, from being part of an exempt distribution service to being consideration for taxable ongoing advisory or asset management services. While the CRA has indicated that this development reflects changes in industry regulation and practice rather than a change in statutory interpretation, the practical effect is that most mutual fund trailing commissions will be subject to GST/HST beginning July 1, 2026.
With an effective date of July 1, 2026, the focus now should be on readiness, as this change will affect contracts, systems, and compliance across the mutual fund industry. Industry participants should consult tax advisors to assess the impact and prepare for implementation.
This article has been prepared for the general information of our clients. Please note that this publication should not be considered a substitute for personalized advice related to your situation.
Related Insights
Contact Us