The Anatomy of an Investigation

The Anatomy of an Investigation

11/19/2025
The Anatomy of an Investigation

When allegations arise or red flags signal misconduct, a forensic investigation must follow a disciplined, legally sound and methodologically rigorous path.

A flawed or rushed approach can jeopardize the findings, escalate legal exposure, or even enable the perpetrator to escape accountability.

Step-by-Step Anatomy of a Financial Misconduct Investigation

Phase

Key Actions

Trigger & Triage

  • Validate red flags or allegations
  • Determine severity, financial impact and urgency

Planning & Scope Definition

  • Define investigation scope, objectives and team
  • Secure relevant authorizations and independence

Data Preservation & Access

  • Identify critical data sources (emails, ERP, CCTV, chats)
  • Implement legal holds and IT locks

Evidence Gathering

  • Extract documents, transactions, communications
  • Conduct digital forensic imaging if needed

Interviews & Behavioural Cues

  • Conduct structured interviews with involved personnel
  • Observe inconsistencies and evasive behaviour

Analysis & Findings

  • Perform transaction testing, pattern recognition and control mapping
  • Compare to known fraud typologies

Reporting & Remediation

  • Draft board-level forensic report with root causes
  • Recommend control fixes and legal steps

Follow-Up

  • Monitor corrective actions, HR actions, regulator filings and potential prosecution

UAE-Specific Considerations

  • Data privacy laws (e.g., UAE Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021) affect how personal data is handled during digital forensics.
  • Labor laws must be respected before suspending employees during investigations.
  • Regulatory bodies like the CBUAE, SCA and MOEC may require disclosure depending on the entity’s license and sector.
  • Audit committee and board involvement must be documented in alignment with good governance.

Real Case Snapshot

“Shredding the Truth” - A Failed Attempt to Destroy Key Evidence in a Procurement Kickback Case

In a semi-government facilities management firm, whistleblower complaints alleged that a senior procurement officer was favoring a vendor in exchange for illicit commissions. Before the internal team could secure records, the accused attempted to shred key hardcopy contracts and delete emails from his account.

Fortunately, the IT team had auto-backups enabled and recovered digital trails. The deleted contracts were partially reconstructed through scanned invoices retrieved from the vendor’s email domain (accessed with legal cooperation). The audit trail also revealed unusual payment terms and prepayments.

The investigation showed:

  • Vendor was over-invoicing by ~18%
  • Commission was routed to a side business owned by the official’s brother
  • Approval process was bypassed using manual overrides

Outcome: The official was terminated, the vendor blacklisted and procurement controls were redesigned to include segregation of duties, pre-vendor due diligence and approval hierarchy logs.

Takeaway: When investigations are triggered, time and evidence are perishable. Rapid containment, IT coordination and legal awareness are crucial to prevent sabotage and cover-ups.

What people say is just as important as what they don’t. Next week, we’ll explore techniques to read between the lines and beyond, when interviewing suspects, witnesses and whistleblowers.


Contact Us


Rakesh Kumar
Rakesh Kumar Dhoot
Associate Partner- Risk Advisory, Forensic & Process Excellence Division