Series Finale: Financial Misconduct Across Industries – One Size Doesn’t Fit All

Series Finale: Financial Misconduct Across Industries – One Size Doesn’t Fit All

12/24/2025
Series Finale: Financial Misconduct Across Industries – One Size Doesn’t Fit All

What We Cover This Week:

As we conclude our 8-week series, we spotlight how financial misconduct manifests uniquely across sectors. Each industry has its own risk terrain, shaped by workflows, compliance frameworks, vendor interactions and incentive models.

Understanding these nuances is critical for designing relevant internal controls and investigative approaches.

Key Components of Cyber Forensics in Financial Investigations

Industry

Common Schemes

Control Gaps

Banking

Insider lending, KYC override, waiver abuse

Segregation of duties, weak monitoring of approvals

Construction

Ghost workers, inflated billing, bid rigging

Weak site controls, no verification of deliverables

Real Estate

Rent skimming, maintenance invoice inflation

Limited audit trail, overreliance on third parties

Healthcare

Double billing, phantom patients, medicine swap

Manual claims processing, no prescription linkage

Retail

Refund fraud, shrinkage manipulation, loyalty fraud

Loose POS oversight, inventory mismatches

Education

Scholarship misuse, exam result tampering

Limited financial audit, poor ethics hotline usage

Real Case Snapshot – Unstructured Benefits Abuse in a Fast-Growing Startup

Background:
An aggressively scaling technology startup provided flexible “discretionary reimbursements” to support employees working remotely during the pandemic. These included wellness, home office setup, training and travel allowances, with minimal documentation.

What Happened:

Two mid-level managers colluded to submit fabricated receipts for training programs and office equipment purchases. Over 18 months, they siphoned off over $150,000 using fake vendors and cleverly edited invoices. There were no secondary approvals or analytics to detect unusual patterns in frequency or amount.

How It Was Uncovered:

An internal audit flagged repeated claims from the same vendor name with minor spelling variations. Forensics uncovered links to bank accounts held by family members of the involved staff. Pattern analysis revealed 80% of reimbursements went through 3 suspicious vendors.

Outcome:
Both employees were terminated. The startup implemented automated claim analytics, dual-level approval workflows and vendor verification protocols.

Key Lesson

  • Unstructured benefits are ripe for misuse in absence of clear controls
  • Collusion often hides behind the illusion of personal expenses
  • Small-ticket frauds can accumulate to significant loss over time

Key Takeaway:

Industry-specific fraud risks demand industry-specific control frameworks. A generic anti-fraud policy won’t detect deep-rooted schemes unique to your operating model.

  • Build tailored risk registers
  • Use contextual analytics
  • Educate staff on the actual risks they face

Series Wrap-up:

Thank you for joining us on this 8-week journey through the lifecycle of financial misconduct investigations, from red flags to boardroom resolutions. This series was just the beginning.

Stay tuned as we return soon with thought leadership on:
Internal Audit Maturity • Business Process Mapping • Digital Governance • Risk Transformation • Ethics Culture

Contact Us


Rakesh Kumar
Rakesh Kumar Dhoot
Associate Partner- Risk Advisory, Forensic & Process Excellence Division