Sir Keir Starmer has announced his resignation as prime minister but will remain in post as caretaker until the Labour Party elects a new leader.
Andy Burnham, the former Mayor of Greater Manchester, appears to be the frontrunner, and with Wes Streeting having indicated he will not stand against him, there is growing a possibility of what could be termed a “coronation”: a swift, largely uncontested transition. That said, Labour leadership contests have surprised before, and until nominations close, nothing is certain.
The timetable is clear: nominations close in mid-July, with a new leader in place before Parliament returns in September. This is obviously a political event, but it’s one that can have economic consequences.
Much of what matters for markets will depend on who the new prime minister’s Chancellor of the Exchequer is. It’s understood that Burnham is actively considering retaining Rachel Reeves. His choice matters: the chancellor controls the UK’s fiscal framework, and markets need to believe they will make responsible decisions on spending, borrowing and taxation.
Despite successive economic shocks, the current fiscal framework has established a broadly stable trajectory for public finances, underpinned by fiscal rules designed to keep borrowing on a sustainable path. That framework matters more to the nation’s creditors than the identity of the prime minister.
The framework is not without its tensions, though. The UK’s fiscal plan assumes no major economic shocks, an assumption that recent years have repeatedly exposed as optimistic. It also assumes that taxes will rise as a share of national income as we approach the next election, which is a politically bold position for any government to sustain. Policymakers are, in all likelihood, quietly hoping that the economy performs somewhat better than official projections suggest, creating a little more room for manoeuvre than the numbers currently imply.
The new political leadership will earn the market’s trust by respecting the judgements of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and the Bank of England (BoE). The country’s robust, independent institutions have become genuine anchors of market confidence. Governments that have attempted to sideline or override those bodies, most memorably in the autumn of 2022, were swiftly reminded of their importance by the bond market’s reaction. Any future leader, from any wing of any party, will face the same institutional constraints.
Markets have remained broadly calm following the prime minister’s announcement, though sentiment could be tested by pledges made during any leadership contest. Currency markets are sensitive to political headlines and would be weakened by candidates over-promising.
Similarly, gilt yields, the interest rates the UK government pays to borrow money, will be closely watched for any signal that an incoming leader intends to shift fiscal policy. It’s worth noting, however, that other global factors may well dominate the picture.
The gradual reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, the critical waterway through which a significant share of the world’s energy supply flows, is a meaningful development for the UK’s economic outlook. A sustained reopening would ease pressure on energy costs, help the inflation picture and negate the need for costly subsidies on fuel bills like those during 2022.
However, the reopening is fragile: it’s slow, could go into reverse, and even a fully reopened Strait is unlikely to handle pre-disruption volumes in the near term. The direction of travel there may well matter more to gilt markets over the coming weeks than anything emerging from Westminster.
Good returns from UK equities are driven by companies, not governments. A change of Labour leader is unlikely to alter that dynamic significantly in either direction.
The single most important variable in the short term is the speed and clarity of the Labour leadership process. If Burnham does emerge effectively unopposed, the uncertainty window closes quickly. A prolonged or fractious contest would extend it.
It’s worth stepping back and placing this moment in its proper context.
The UK’s underlying economic fundamentals, the trajectory of interest rates, the path of inflation, employment levels and consumer demand, are shaped by forces that are largely independent of who occupies Downing Street. The BoE sets monetary policy according to its inflation mandate, not the political calendar. Most of the challenges facing the UK economy will confront any political leadership in broadly the same way.
For investors with diversified portfolios, UK political noise is one input among many. Developments in the U.S., Europe, and Asia carry equal or greater weight in determining overall portfolio performance.
Moments of short-term volatility have, historically, created selective opportunities for patient, well-positioned investors. The discipline to hold course, or to act thoughtfully rather than reactively, has consistently been rewarded over time. The relatively high bond yields available over recent months have been attractive investments for many of our clients.
Political transitions rarely reshape economic fundamentals and this one, with a clear timetable, a caretaker government in place, and fiscal continuity signalled, is unlikely to prove an exception.
We are here to support you through any questions and concerns. Please do not hesitate to get in touch with your Financial Planning Consultant if you would like to discuss this further.
DisclaimersCrowe Financial Planning UK Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to provide independent financial advice (FRN 185323). This insight is approved for use by Crowe Financial Planning UK Limited on the date issued. The information on this page is for information purposes only, based on our understanding of legislation and market practice at the time of writing. It does not constitute financial, legal or tax advice, and appropriate professional advice should be sought before any course of action is pursued. Where professional financial advice is sought, fees will apply and will vary depending on the complexity of the individual case. Any advice will be based on personal circumstances, and as with all financial planning, outcomes will depend on a range of factors that cannot always be predicted or guaranteed. The value of investments can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed; investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and is subject to change. The FCA does not regulate Trusts, Tax or Estate Planning. The division of pension assets on divorce involves both financial and legal considerations, independent legal advice should be sought alongside any financial planning guidance. Please be aware that clicking links to third-party websites will take you away from the Crowe Financial Planning website. We are not responsible for the accuracy of information contained within linked sites. |