Provider-based status: Is your organization compliant?

Nicole Bellelo, Cody Loup
| 3/20/2024
Kodiak Solutions

Provider-based status rules can change frequently. Are you up to date?

Understanding Medicare’s provider-based status regulation is crucial for today’s hospitals. As with other healthcare regulatory areas, a constantly evolving and increasingly complex industry landscape makes keeping up with the changes – and staying compliant – more important than ever.

What is provider-based status?

Provider-based status is a Medicare payment designation established by the Social Security Act that allows certain healthcare facilities to bill Medicare as a hospital outpatient department. This billing designation often results in hospitals receiving higher reimbursement through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) outpatient prospective payment system.

The following types of facilities can seek provider-based status:

  • Outpatient department of a main provider (located on campus or off campus)
  • Remote location of the main provider that furnishes inpatient hospital services
  • Satellite facility of the main provider that provides inpatient services
  • Joint venture located on the main provider’s campus

Hospital leadership should review the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations for full definitions and requirements for meeting provider-based status. In addition, it’s important for hospitals and health systems to know their inventory of provider-based clinics. Leaders across departments, including revenue cycle, cost report, and 340B Drug Pricing Program management, should work together to identify these.

Sign up to receive updates on the latest healthcare industry trends, developments, and business needs.

Compliance: Meeting provider-based status requirements

Organizations must meet several requirements to be designated as a provider-based clinic. The following requirements are for all on-campus and off-campus clinics.

  • Attestation. Attestation is voluntary. To remain compliant, a facility must bill CMS properly and have operational standards in place to comply with the provider-based status requirements.
  • Licensure. In many instances, provider-based clinics will be able to operate under the same license as the main hospitals with which they are associated. Requirements vary by state, so organizations will want to closely examine the rules in their locations.
  • Clinical integration. Clinical services by a provider-based entity and main provider must be integrated according to CMS regulatory standards. Overall, their services are considered integrated if the following are true:
    • Professional staff have privileges at the main provider.
    • The provider-based clinic has the same monitoring and oversight as the main provider’s other departments.
    • The medical director maintains a reporting relationship with the main provider’s chief medical officer or other similar official who has the same frequency, intensity, and level of accountability as other medical directors.
    • The main provider’s medical staff and other professional committees are responsible for the provider-based entity’s activities (for example, quality assurance, utilization review, and coordination and integration of services).
    • The provider-based clinic’s medical records are integrated with those of the main provider (so each site can retrieve one another’s records).
    • Inpatient and outpatient services are integrated to provide patients with access to all the main provider’s services.
  • Financial integration. A provider-based clinic must be fully integrated with the main provider’s financial system, including shared income and expenses. The clinic’s costs should be reported in the main provider’s appropriate cost centers, and financial status should be incorporated – and readily identified – in the main provider’s trial balance. In addition, the provider-based clinic’s costs and revenue should appear in the main provider’s cost report.
  • Public awareness. Noncompliance in the area of public awareness can lead to poor patient experience in addition to breach of CMS regulations. To meet public awareness requirements, provider-based clinics must present themselves to the public and other payors as being a part of the main provider. Patients who enter the provider-based entity should know they are entering a facility affiliated with the main provider (not an independent physician clinic) and should be billed accordingly. Provider-based facilities are required to make sure all public-facing communications – such as signage, websites, marketing materials, patient handouts, and forms – indicate that the location is part of the main provider.

In addition to these requirements that apply to on- and off-campus provider-based clinics, CMS has several additional requirements specifically for off-campus clinics seeking provider-based department status, including rules for ownership and control, administration and supervision, and patient responsibility. Facilities defined as off-campus clinics will want to thoroughly understand those requirements to remain compliant.

Adding to the complexity, separate, additional provider-based requirements also exist for joint ventures, hospital outpatient departments, and off-campus locations operated under management contracts. Provider-based clinics also must meet several billing requirements. Hospital and healthcare leadership should work closely with revenue cycle staff to better understand these requirements and to help ensure all billing procedures are designed for compliance with provider-based payment designation.

Understanding risks

Not complying with CMS requirements for provider-based status can expose entities – and the main providers – to several risks, including:

  • Financial implications, such as overpayments to the government (Medicare) or other payors
  • False Claims Act implications, such as if the provider-based clinic is not billing correctly
  • Impacts to 340B Drug Pricing Program eligibility
  • Cost report implications if the provider-based clinics are not included on the main provider’s cost report
  • Impacts to resident counts for graduate medical education and indirect medical education payments (if applicable to the entity)
  • Damage to facility reputation and public perception

Compliance strategies

To help mitigate some of these risks, internal auditors, along with hospital or health system operational leaders, should become more familiar with provider-based status regulations and requirements. In addition to reading the provider-based guidance in the Code of Federal Regulations and consulting with legal and compliance leaders, they should consider the following audit approaches to close risk gaps:

  • Obtain and review a full list or inventory of provider-based locations.
  • Conduct site visits for on-campus and off-campus locations.
  • Examine the documentation for each applicable component of the provider-based status regulations.
  • Use a checklist to evaluate evidence that requirements have been met. CMS has a provider-based attestation document that includes a sample attestation statement that can be used as a checklist when assessing requirements.
  • Use data analytics to test compliance with provider-based billing requirements. Analytics allow an organization to evaluate billing data from multiple lenses and can test an entire population of provider-based clinic claims, leading to a more accurate evaluation of provider-based status billing compliance.

Need help with provider-based status?

As with other complex healthcare regulations, rules for provider-based status can change frequently. Some organizations might not have the staff to keep on top of compliance requirements – or the data analytics to dig deep enough to evaluate billing compliance. Kodiak Solutions does.

For help staying up to date about requirements, proactively identifying risks, and remaining compliant, consider reaching out to Kodiak’s provider-based status specialists today.

Nicole Bellelo
Nicole Bellelo
Director, Kodiak Solutions
Cody Loup
Cody Loup
Kodiak Solutions