This became effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2025. These changes are based on the International Accounting Standards Board’s Supplier Finance Arrangements amendments to IAS 7 and IFRS 7, issued in May 2023, and have been incorporated into Section 7 of FRS 102.
Although not one of the landmark updates for the revised FRS 102, the changes nevertheless have consequences for any business that relies on third-party finance providers to improve cash flow flexibility.
These arrangements can improve liquidity management, but there’s also a risk of creating hidden debt and obscuring the accurate timing of cash flows. The new disclosure requirements should provide greater clarity on these arrangements, allowing users of financial statements to see the full picture.
If businesses are using supplier finance arrangements, they must now disclose them.
Supplier finance can create hidden liabilities and liquidity pressure. The new disclosures make these obligations visible to investors, lenders and other stakeholders.
Financial guarantees and payment instruments (such as credit cards) are not treated as supplier finance arrangements, because they simply settle the amount owed rather than financing it.
Clarifying what exactly constitutes Supplier Finance will help eliminate confusion.
Supplier finance, also known as reverse factoring or payables finance, is a form of short-term financing. But the key characteristic is that the finance provider is extending credit, not the supplier.
It does not apply to the following financing instruments, unless the arrangement effectively shifts payment timing or credit risk to a third party:
Businesses must disclose the following in their financial statements:
Disclosure of the key terms and conditions will help financial statements users to better understand the true nature of a business’s financial obligations and where these may divert from standard payment terms.
i) Retailer using a bank’s early payment platform.
Suppliers can opt to receive early payment from the bank (the finance provider), while the retailer benefits from extended payment terms, typically 60–90 days.
Result: The retailer has a liability to the bank, which must be disclosed.
ii) Construction company using payables finance.
The main contractor facilitates early payment to subcontractors and suppliers via a finance facility with a bank.
Result: Updated disclosure requirements reduce the potential for this scenario to mask debt or distort cash flow timing.
iii) Large manufacturer partnering with a fintech payables platform
Suppliers are offered early payment or dynamic discounting through a third-party fintech provider.
Result: Key terms, amounts involved, and the range of payment due dates must be disclosed by the manufacturer.
Businesses should still be working proactively to establish compliance in time for the key amendments within Section 7 of the FRS 102 amendments, covering Supplier Finance Arrangements, to take effect:
Some subsidiaries and smaller group entities report under FRS 102’s reduced disclosure framework (RDF). These businesses (“Qualifying entities”) are exempt from the new supplier-finance disclosure requirements only if the group’s consolidated financial statements already include equivalent information. If the group accounts don’t cover this, the entity must make the disclosures itself.
Our audit and accounting advisory service can help you accommodate new FRS 102 standards on supplier finance into your financial reporting, as well as advise on setting up your processes and training your key people.
Crowe Ireland provides expert advisory services to numerous businesses and organisations. To learn more about the impact of new regulations from a compliance and financial reporting perspective and how we can help you, get in touch today.