The $2.6 Trillion AI Planning Paradox
In a world where organizations are investing $2.6 trillion in AI by 2025, a glaring paradox emerges: the wider the gap between planning and execution. Companies spend months perfecting strategies, while competitors launch imperfect solutions and iterate rapidly. Ironically, these elaborate frameworks become barriers to progress, turning planning into sophisticated procrastination. With 68% of AI projects stalling before production, it's clear that over-planning leads to missed opportunities.
Framework Fever: The Bureaucratic Maze
Consultants have transformed AI adoption into a labyrinth of phases:
This cycle, exemplified by Netflix's agile rise over Blockbuster's planning, highlights how frameworks delay action.
The 80/20 Rule of AI: Small Experiments Beat Grand Strategies
The Pareto Principle reigns in AI: 20% effort on focused experiments yields 80% value. A simple chatbot for FAQs or an email classifier saves hours daily. Competitors ship dozens of "boring" solutions, learning and compounding advantages, while others chase perfect ecosystems.
Shipping Sins: Common Excuses for Inaction
Leaders often hide behind excuses:
These are procrastination tactics.
The Minimum Viable AI Approach: Start Ugly, Learn Fast, Scale Smart
Embrace empiricism:
Ship real solutions to learn from reality, not roadmaps.
90-Day Transformations: Companies That Ditched Frameworks
Real success stories:
They started "ugly," learned by doing, and scaled relentlessly.
Your 30-Day Shipping Challenge
Stop planning—start shipping:
Ship It to Predict the Future
"The best way to predict the future is to ship it." Ditch frameworks and embrace iterative AI. Tomorrow's leaders aren't planners they're shippers who act today.
Read More