At Crowe, our mission is to assist our instructing solicitors in their objective of helping resolve disputes on behalf of their clients, or alternatively providing advice ahead of such disputes potentially developing.
We recognise that contentious proceedings may not be familiar territory for many lay clients, and so we adopt an empathic approach to understand the client’s objectives. We also recognise that it is important for expert witness services to be provided in a cost-effective and proportionate manner, and hence we ensure that all our work is tailored to achieve the client’s requirements.
Notwithstanding this, we have a well-deserved reputation for proactively identifying solutions and approaches to add value for our clients.
Our expert witness team is led by Chris Hine, who has 25 years experience as a forensic accounting partner, which includes giving evidence approximately 30 times.
Our role can vary according to the requirements of each individual case. We can act as adviser, assist within the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process and, where required, act as an expert witness.
The adviser role allows us to provide objective opinion to our client on the strengths and weaknesses of their case, identifying tactical opportunities and, where appropriate, anticipating counterarguments and responding to these. We provide strategic advice to enhance the client‘s position.
We can assist in ADR proceedings in a number of ways. When approaching a process such as mediation, we can provide an assessment of the merits of the arguments relating to quantum in a cost-effective manner so that you are properly prepared ahead of negotiations. We can assist in the ADR process itself either in person, or by telephone.
Where expert evidence is required, we will produce reports compliant with all relevant legal and professional requirements, recognising our overarching duty is to the Court, and underpinned by the quality of our analysis and explanations to provide compelling testimony.
In addition to the above areas, which relate to litigation and arbitration, we also offer assistance in relation to expert determination proceedings. We have considerable experience both as advisers to the parties, and of acting as the expert determining the dispute. Chris Hine’s recent experience includes an expert determination involving over sixty companies and eight jurisdictions.
The main areas in which we provide assistance include:
We assist in many types of commercial disputes, including:
We have vast experience in relation to commercial litigation cases, from disputes over the loss of profits arising from a printing machine failing to achieve quoted production levels, to a $1bn international dispute involving an overseas bank and a listed property group.
We were instructed on one of the “top 20” cases of the year involving a $1bn claim for defamation and misrepresentation. Our role was to undertake financial analysis to determine whether the allegations that had been publicised could be substantiated.
This was a very large matter spanning a number of jurisdictions, requiring the coordination of a large team and the ability to handle huge quantities of information. Our analysis demonstrated that there were significant inconsistencies in the explanations put forward by the other side. Their credibility was undermined and the case settled seven weeks into the initial 12 week trial on very favourable terms.
We have acted on behalf of the liquidator in a number of disputes where there were allegations of wrongful trading and preferences against the former directors. Our work has involved investigation of the finances and financial records of the company, investigating the circumstances and allegations, and providing reports to identify and substantiate what has occurred.
Chris Hine was instructed by the solicitors acting for the liquidator of an airline to investigate allegations of a preference, whereby valuable freight contracts had been transferred to a phoenix company but the onerous leases on the older, less efficient aircraft had been left behind. Our role was both to assess the value of the contracts and also to identify the profits that had been generated by operating the contracts in the new company. In cases such as this, funding is one of the major challenges but here a wronged creditor (the lessor) was able to allow the liquidator to pursue the matter to the stage where a settlement was achieved.
Our work involves assessment of quantum in cases arising from:
Chris Hine has particular expertise in sale and purchase disputes, including having given evidence in the leading case of Sycamore Bidco.
A private equity house invested in an MBO of a business involved in the provision of employee benefits. The directors chose to adopt an accounting treatment for one item which artificially enhanced turnover in the pre-acquisition audited accounts, although it had no impact on net profit. This, however, created an apparent level of exponential growth within the company, which was used in the financial models to project future performance and in turn drove the value of the business.
When it became apparent, post-acquisition, that this accounting treatment had been adopted, the investing company took action against the vendors for both misrepresentation and breach of warranty. Our role was to identify the accounting treatment that would normally be adopted in relation to this item, the valuation that would have been placed upon the business had the proper accounting treatment been adopted, and the impact of this on the actions of the acquiring company. The matter went to a 32-day trial, with a successful outcome for our client.
Our work in this area can be to act as a single joint expert, preparing a report on valuation, liquidity and tax consequences on behalf of both parties. We also undertake advisory work where we act as a shadow expert on behalf of one party. Such assistance can be ahead of disclosure to provide tactical advice on timing and the approach to the case. We have also advised on the contents of questionnaires. When the single joint expert report has been prepared we have assisted with the preparation of questions and, where necessary, interpretation of the report.
Chris Hine acted as an adviser in the leading case of Jones v Jones and as an expert in the case of Sharland v Sharland.
Chris Hine was appointed to value the shareholding of the husband in a metal plating business owned by the husband and his brother.
As with any business valuation the key to our work was obtaining an understanding of the business and the key features that enabled its profits to be sustained going forward. A telephone interview was undertaken with the husband and also his brother who was the financial director. Ahead of these conversations, we spoke to the wife in order to obtain her knowledge and understanding of the business, and to identify if there were any issues she was aware of that we should address in our conversations with the owner managers.
Based on this information gathering exercise, and subsequent analysis and verification of the data, we were able to prepare a valuation of the business which, together with its ability to extract funds from a non-trading asset, enabled financial resolution to be achieved.
We have undertaken a significant number of sports disputes, particularly in relation to football clubs. Areas in which we have provided reports include:
Chris Hine was instructed to act as the expert for the Claimants in the matter of Middlesbrough Football Club v Liverpool Football Club. The case related to the transfer of Christian Ziege from Middlesbrough to Liverpool, allegedly as a result of a breach of confidentiality. Much of this matter is in the public domain as it was covered in the national press.
Our role was to quantify the losses Middlesbrough had suffered as a result of no longer having Ziege as a member of their team. This was assessed on a ‘loss of a chance’ basis, correlating the likely success of the team had Ziege still been at Middlesbrough, and the consequential impact on the Merit Award. Calculations were performed to quantify the losses arising from lower season ticket sales, match day attendances and their impact on sales of replica merchandise, catering and associated sales.
Chris prepared an expert report and joint statement and the case settled at mediation shortly before a final hearing.
We have advised in many professional negligence cases. In some cases we are simply asked to provide quantum advice, as with other commercial litigation disputes. On other occasions, we work in conjunction with other disciplines within our firm, to provide focused advice, which can encompass the duty of care of the relevant professionals as well as quantum matters.
The professional indemnity solicitors for a heating and ventilation contractor instructed us in relation to a claim by a theatre. It was alleged that the airflows in the auditorium were badly designed resulting in all the heat leaving the theatre when the curtain opened. This was alleged to have resulted in lower attendances and sales of ice cream etc.
Our analysis showed that the activity levels of the theatre were not consistent with the allegations, and there was no correlation with variables such as the temperature, as would be expected. The claim settled for a fraction of the headline figure.